I?m using Nameko http://wiz.homelinux.net/php.php

It has not a lot of funcionalities, but is very easy to configure and
maintain (only 1 php file).


-----Mensaje original-----
De: Nathan Day [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviado el: martes, 10 de mayo de 2005 16:06
Para: [email protected]
Asunto: FW: Webmail access


 Hi,

I'm looking into webmail solution for my James configuration and
wondered if anyone on this list had any experience of doing this with
the current version of James. As in a work around until the IMAP
functionality is more complete and stable.

Many thanks,

Nathan

-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Webb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 May 2005 15:01
To: Nathan Day
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Webmail access

Hi Nathan,
Just as a matter of protocol it's better to ask these sort of questions
on the [email protected] mailing list as you'll get a lot
more feedback on what people are using for webmail.

As regards IMAP; there is not enough functionality to use yet, as
messages are not persisted to disk, but are only held in memory. I am
currently working on this, but I don't really have a time frame at the
moment.

-- Jason

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nathan Day [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 10 May 2005 12:40
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Webmail access
>
> Hi,
>
> I am happily using James as my email server for personal mail and it
> is running on a Linux box connected to my home broadband connection. I

> am very happy with performance and functionality. The only thing I
> would like to do, but seemingly can't is access the mail boxes through

> a browser.
>
> I know IMAP support is on the way and that I could use one of the many

> open source JSP/Servlet solutions out there deployed in Tomcat or
> something, but are there any alternatives for me in the meantime?
>
> Additionally, how functional is the IMAP functionality that has
> currently been developed and not released? Would it be worth trying
> some of the nightly source releases to play with the IMAP
> functionality or is it pretty immature at this stage?
>
> Many thanks,
>
> Nathan



______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to