Hmm I am not sure, if I were you I'd look it up in the James API and see
what properties a Message or whatever name they use has.  I remember it
had things like ghost and such.

Either way, if it doesn't - it would be a snap to add that property
there.

Ivan

>-----Original Message-----
>From: David Erickson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 3:46 PM
>To: 'James Users List'
>Subject: RE: James SMTP Auth Question
>
>Right I know that too.  But as a mail message is cruising through the
>pipeline, is there some kind of tag or something on it that says, "Hey
I
>was
>given to James from an Authenticated client, so I'm legal to send out
to
>remote domains"?
>
>-David
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ivan Jouikov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 4:43 PM
>> To: 'James Users List'
>> Subject: RE: James SMTP Auth Question
>>
>> It's been a while since I set it up, but as far as I remember, SMTP
auth
>> wasn't a mailet, it was set up inside SMTP server itself.  After all,
>> it's a part of the protocol, not just some processing add-on.
>>
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >From: David Erickson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 3:41 PM
>> >To: 'James Users List'
>> >Subject: RE: James SMTP Auth Question
>> >
>> >That is what I figured, but where at in the mailets is that defined?
I
>> >mean
>> >all mail goes through the same processing pipeline, so how does
James
>> know
>> >a
>> >piece of mail destined for a remote address was given it from an
AUTH'd
>> >client versus a non-auth'd one?
>> >
>> >-David
>> >
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: Ivan Jouikov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 4:37 PM
>> >> To: 'James Users List'
>> >> Subject: RE: James SMTP Auth Question
>> >>
>> >> You kind of confused me there a bit, but here's my knowledge:
>> >>
>> >> When Auth is turned on, you simply add an option for a client to
>> >> authenticate.
>> >>
>> >> A client who is NOT authenticated can only send messages to local
>> >> address.
>> >>
>> >> A client who is authenticated can also relay messages.
>> >>
>> >> I hope that clears things up.
>> >>
>> >> >-----Original Message-----
>> >> >From: David Erickson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 12:29 PM
>> >> >To: 'James Users List'
>> >> >Subject: RE: James SMTP Auth Question
>> >> >
>> >> >Yes but when you turn SMTP auth on, what is it really doing to
the
>> >> >processing pipeline?  Because James will accept mail from anyone,
>> >> auth'd or
>> >> >not.  It has to else messages delivered from other email servers
>> with
>> >> local
>> >> >destinations would not be accepted.  So the question is how then
>> does
>> >> James
>> >> >know when you get down into your transport processor, after
you've
>> >> >delivered
>> >> >emails with a local destination, that it is ok or not to try and
>> send
>> >> out
>> >> >emails with remote destinations?  Is there a flag or something
that
>> is
>> >> >being
>> >> >set on the Mail object?
>> >> >
>> >> >-David
>> >> >
>> >> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> >> From: Ivan Jouikov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >> Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 11:16 AM
>> >> >> To: 'James Users List'
>> >> >> Subject: RE: James SMTP Auth Question
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Umm, it doesn't.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> All the messages that arrive from "another mail server" could
only
>> >> >> arrive with 2 purposes:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 1)  It's a message to a local account.  When the message is
local
>> -
>> >> we
>> >> >> automatically accept it.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 2)  If it's not a message to a local account - someone's trying
to
>> >> relay
>> >> >> thru you (probably spammers).  This is where you don't want to
be
>> an
>> >> >> open relay which's why you have your SMTP auth.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >-----Original Message-----
>> >> >> >From: David Erickson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >> >Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 9:21 AM
>> >> >> >To: 'James Users List'
>> >> >> >Subject: James SMTP Auth Question
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Just curious but how does James know the difference between
mail
>> >> sent
>> >> >> in
>> >> >> >from an authenticated user for remote delivery, from mail sent
in
>> >> from
>> >> >> >another email server where the host is not local and needs
remote
>> >> >> delivery?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Thanks,
>> >> >> >David
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >>
>>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >> >To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >> >For additional commands, e-mail:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >--
>> >> >> >No virus found in this incoming message.
>> >> >> >Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
>> >> >> >Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.10/73 - Release
Date:
>> >> >> 8/15/2005
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> >> >> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
>> >> >> Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.10/73 - Release Date:
>> >> 8/15/2005
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >--
>> >> >No virus found in this incoming message.
>> >> >Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
>> >> >Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.10/73 - Release Date:
>> >> 8/15/2005
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> >> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
>> >> Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.10/73 - Release Date:
>> 8/15/2005
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >--
>> >No virus found in this incoming message.
>> >Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
>> >Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.10/73 - Release Date:
>> 8/15/2005
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> --
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
>> Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.10/73 - Release Date:
8/15/2005
>>
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>--
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
>Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.10/73 - Release Date:
8/15/2005



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to