Still would be cool to let the users list know whether someone takes up the IMAP work. We may not care how it's done, but I would like to know whether it has someone or some group working on it or if it's progress is stalled. Steve Brewin wrote:
>Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > > >>I had suggested JavaMail, but when we all did further looking, it was >>observed that JavaMail is not efficient for server storage, >>it would tie us >>to JavaMail, and worse to MimeMessage. We really want a >>store that deals >>with streams, from which we can easily construct a >>MimeMessage on demand, >>but can also use MIME4J without the overhead --- and parsing >>issues --- of >>the MimeMessage class. >> >>If those are solvable within the context of using JavaMail >>for server-side >>storage, fine. Alternatively, if we have a data store that >>works for us and >>can be put underneath JavaMail when/if we want to use >>JavaMail, that's fine, >>too. >> >>Might we move this discussion to [EMAIL PROTECTED] :-) >> >> > >Good idea! > >Sent this to server-dev. Will comment there. > >-- Steve > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------- Support Open Source, Demand Quality Software --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
