Edward Tan wrote: > I have tried mime4j just now and I compared it with James that uses Javax > mail.
Thank you for your tests! > So it seems a bit dangerous to use javax.mail since we will never know when > some emails will go to error folder because of OutOfMemory. Mime4j let us only to read messages and not to write/modify them. So we are stick to javamail by now. Furthermore we exposed javamail MimeMessage in Mailet APIs so we will able to change this dependency in james 3.0+. This tests are indeed useful to start planning changes for the next major release (3.0). > ---------------- > > Other problem I encountered using mime4j (sample tester: MessageTree), it > raises exception when processing text/plain with charset ISO-8859-1. > > I saw that someone has incorporated mime4j into James, though still > experimental. But I don't find any version of James that contains mime4j. Sorry, but I've got no answers for this. Stefano --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
