Ahmed Mohombe wrote:
James is not currently actively supported/sponsored by companies
Of course there is no companies support.
Companies need stable IMAP solutions and easy to configure server
through GUIs not editing per telnet some strange config files.
None of the above features are(or were) a target of JAMES.
If James had stable support for all of the companies needs then James
would not need their support any more ;-)
If every company paying for a proprietary solution would instead
contribute something to James we probably would have IMAP/GUI and
anything else.
My company is using James and we committed a lot of improvement to James
. We chose james because we needed flexibility and we need a java
mailserver to be easily integrated in our existing java application.
Any contribution/effort on the IMAP/GUI side is welcome: I currently
actively review patches and apply them as soon as possible.
After 2.3.0 release we've already planned changes to the Mailet APIs and
repositories interfaces to simplify IMAP development but I only will
work on the first changes and not to the IMAP capability itself.
Stefano
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
