On 18/01/06, Ahmed Mohombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > James is not currently actively supported/sponsored by companies
> Of course there is no companies support.
> Companies need stable IMAP solutions and easy to configure server
> through GUIs not editing per telnet some strange config files.
> None of the above features are(or were) a target of JAMES.

James isn't actively supported by companies who might wish to devote a
little effort to realising those goals in return for no licence fees.
So James doesn't meet their requirements, not really surprising, and
nothing to apologise about.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to