Danny,

I appreciate your response.  I completely agree.  I have well over 30 years
in this industry and completely understand your position (and 100% agree
with it).

Although given the time to really understand the DNS arena, and given the
time to become intimately familiar with James' internal implementation, I
have no doubt I could create a workaround.  But that 'time' isn't available,
so a workaround is not on the radar for me now. I'll just continue to argue
with Register.

Even with the frustration, this has been a tremendous education for me in
this area.

BTW... even though Register.com imposes this MX violation on their customer
base, they aren't stupid enough to do it their own site.  Register.com's MX
records are compliant.  I called their hand on that, and got no explanation
other than, 'we do it differently for our domain', yet adamantly say their
entire little castle comes crashing down if they do it correctly for their
customers.  Go figure.

Thanks again so much.  You have been extremely helpful.

Jerry

-----Original Message-----
From: Danny Angus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 5:25 AM
To: James Users List
Subject: RE: "Can't find DNS for domain" when domain does exist


> copied your response to Register.  According them, RFCs are now simply
>'suggestions'...  Is that true?  I thought they were already mandatory.

They are never mandatory.
What they do is to permit interoperability between two people who both
choose to independantly follow the same rules.

James chooses to follow the rules, register.com doesn't. Go figure.

> In the meantime, apparently two wrongs will have to make a right.  If you
> could consider adding the incorrect implementation to deal with screwups
> like Register, I'd appreciate it.


The principle we follow is[1]

"We believe that it is our responsibility to adhere to the published
standard. If we allow our implementation to deviate it means that we are
tacitly encouraging the situation whereby interoperability is no longer
guarenteed by standards compliance alone, but also requires access to
undocumented and possibly even commercially licenced technology. There is
no easy route for a newcomer to aquire these secrets, and interoperabilty
becomes something only available to the elite. "

We have no interest in being bloody minded about it though and would
probably be prepared to make the change you require as an optional feature
disabled by default, but you may have to do it yourself or motivate someone
else to do it.

d.

[1] http://james.apache.org/design_objectives.html


***************************************************************************
The information in this e-mail is confidential and for use by the
addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient (or responsible for
delivery of the message to the intended recipient) please notify us
immediately on 0141 306 2050 and delete the message from your computer. You
may not copy or forward it or use or disclose its contents to any other
person. As Internet communications are capable of data corruption Student
Loans Company Limited does not accept any  responsibility for changes made
to this message after it was sent. For this reason it may be inappropriate
to rely on advice or opinions contained in an e-mail without obtaining
written confirmation of it. Neither Student Loans Company Limited or the
sender accepts any liability or responsibility for viruses as it is your
responsibility to scan attachments (if any). Opinions and views expressed in
this e-mail are those of the sender and may not reflect the opinions and
views of The Student Loans Company Limit
 ed.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the
presence of computer viruses.

**************************************************************************

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to