Also, many list servers spoof the from domain when they send mail on
behalf of a third party. Generally, these list servers don't bother to
bind a DNS entry to their mail server - in which case you might find
that you get false positives.

On 6/30/06, Serge Knystautas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/29/06, JWM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been using the default matcher for "SenderInFakeDomain" ever since I
> installed James. I've never been aware of any problems with it.  But in the
> last week, I've had at least two hits on apparently perfectly valid emails.
> One was from sbcglobal.net.  Both were from people known by the recipient.
>
> Where did that list of fake ip addresses that were shipped in the config
> file originate?  Is it possible that these IPs have changed and some have
> become legit?
>
> I would think that somehow the sender was hacking and spoofing.  But that is
> almost an impossibility, given who the senders were.
>
> Can someone enlighten me on what may be happening here?  Is that simply not
> a trustworthy matcher to filter email out?

What it's doing is looking up the domain of the incoming email
address.  The point is that if you get a message from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and lokitech.com does not exist or is not
configured for mail, then there's a high chance this is a fake email.

The one scenario that causes this approach a problem is when a domain
has temporary DNS problems.  This could be why your recipients were
getting bounced.  Normally it is a good check, but others might be
able to speak better as to how widely used and accepted it is.

--
Serge Knystautas
Lokitech >> software . strategy . design >> http://www.lokitech.com
p. 301.656.5501
e. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to