Stephano, Thank you for this information. Think of implementing DSN in James quickly ?
If not, I think that I can make a hack in James to integrate this option and to validate conformity with protocle LMTP. I could do it in September, planned something on you side ? Best Regards Yannick 2006/7/11, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
As far as I understand we can't correctly implement LMTP until we integrate full DSN support in our internal spooling/delivery processing. Once we'll have DSN it will be really easy to support it as we already support PIPELINE and ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES and we already have a modular way to build an "SMTP like" server, reusing commands. Stefano yannick quenec'hdu wrote: > Hi stephano; > > LMTP makes it possible to synchronize the data between a serveur smtp and > few mailbox of the users, especially if mailbox them are on a distant > machine. > > LMTP speaks a protocol similar to smtp which is optimized for the delivery > with the server of mailbox such Cyrus. The advantage of this configuration > is that a Postfix machine can supply several server of mailbox via LMTP. > The > opposite is true also: a mailbox server can be supplied via LMTP by > multiple > Postfix machines. > > Posftix and cyrus use LMTP. > > Yannick > > 2006/7/6, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> Anybody have a link or can write which mailserver currently support LMTP >> and what are the advantages of LMTP vs SMTP for such usage? >> >> Stefano >> >> yannick quenec'hdu wrote: >> > Hi Noel, >> > >> > It is a pity well, it is an advantage to dialogue between mail server >> > >> > thank you for your answer >> > >> > 2006/7/6, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> >> >> > I would like to know if James Server support the protocol LMTP ? >> >> >> >> Not at this time, although there was some talk at ApacheCon about it. >> >> >> >> --- Noel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
