I cannot reproduce this.
I just tried sending a message and the header has a good return-path
with my own address. I also tried sending to an unknown address so that
James generate a bounce and the bounce has:
"Return-Path: <>".
This is correct by RFC.
Can you provide more informations about your issue? (Mail you send,
configuration, mail received)
Mark Brennand wrote:
I am running a test install of JAMES 2.3.0b3, with my main server happily
running JAMES 2.2.0 for the last 18 months or so. Amongst the changes I have
noticed on this test install is that the 'Return-Path' header value is set
to "null" in mail sent from the server. This is not the case in JAMES 2.2.0.
Is this considered normal??
Regards MB
- Mark Brennand
- ACTiVEiNGREDiENT -
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
