> I'm in the beginning stages of evaluating JAMES. While I agree with
> some of the points in http://wiki.apache.org/james/NoFastFail, I
> would still like to persue implementing fast fail under JAMES.
We have fast-fail support in JAMES v2.3, and considerable effort is going into
enhancing it even more. We all recognize that the SMTP landscape has
continued to change, with millions of MS-Windows users contributing to billions
of spoofed SPAM messages.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
