Marcello Marangio ha scritto: >>> So if after a PASS a QUIT is not issued, the user gets stuck. >>> >>> The question is: if a client chooses the USER and PASS sequence to get >> the >>> authentication (instead of APOP), is the QUIT command mandatory? >>> > > Anyway, the question is the same, even if is more rfc1939 related rather > than james: is QUIT command the ONLY way to pass from the AUTHENTICATION > state to the UPDATE state?
If you want my opinion you have to reset the lock on session close anyway. It is not acceptable that a disconnect in the AUTHENTICATION phase results in a forever locked inbox. Stefano --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
