Good point,

could you create a jira issue for it ?

Bye,
Norman

2010/7/26 冉兵 <[email protected]>:
> one more thing:
>
> The error code returned from the ValidEcptHandler is 554 for invalid local
> user. Should it be 550 to be more specific?
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "冉兵" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 5:11 PM
> To: "James Users List" <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: email sending status
>
>> Hi Norman,
>>
>> I just noticed the smtp handler chain config file and realized that I have
>> been using James SMTP without much protection from spamming.
>>
>> I see the ValidRcptHandler sample config and I'll try enabling that.
>>
>> But in larger picture, what are the recommended handlers one should be
>> using in a production server?
>>
>> Help is appreciated!
>>
>> Bing
>>
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> From: "Norman Maurer" <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2010 1:28 AM
>> To: "James Users List" <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: email sending status
>>
>>> Hi Bing,
>>>
>>> the RemoteDelivery idea is good. Maybe we could even add some kind of
>>> listener to RemoteDelivery which will get triggered on success,perm
>>> errror and temp error. WDYT ?
>>>
>>> About the recipient check, In current trunk there is the
>>> ValidRcptHandler which will take care of rejecting non existing users
>>> in the smtp dialog. We made it configurable because sometimes you want
>>> to really accept every email ( for example when building a spamtrap).
>>>
>>> Bye,
>>> Norman
>>>
>>>
>>> 2010/7/24 冉兵 <[email protected]>:
>>>>
>>>> Exactly.
>>>>
>>>> I am thinking embedding some code similar to RemoteDelivery in my web
>>>> app to
>>>> talk to remote SMTP server responsible for the customer's . Would it be
>>>> a
>>>> viable approach?
>>>>
>>>> BTW, I just found that James did not verify the existence of the local
>>>> accounts in the SMTP service until later in the delivery pipe. The
>>>> result is
>>>> that the SMTP always takes any incoming emails. It seems to better "fail
>>>> right away". What do you think?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> Bing
>>>>
>>>> --------------------------------------------------
>>>> From: "Norman Maurer" <[email protected]>
>>>> Sent: Saturday, July 24, 2010 2:01 AM
>>>> To: "James Users List" <[email protected]>
>>>> Subject: Re: email sending status
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Bing,
>>>>>
>>>>> could you explain in bit more ? You need to tell your clients if the
>>>>> email is still in the queue,bounced or sent ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Bye,
>>>>> Norman
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2010/7/23 冉兵 <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi again,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My hacking with James continues.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This time I'd like to build a service to James for SMTP clients to
>>>>>> query
>>>>>> for the status of previous SMTP requests. The use case is email
>>>>>> verification
>>>>>> at customer registration. I'd like to give customer concrete feedback
>>>>>> as to
>>>>>> the status of sending the verification email: sent successfully, bad
>>>>>> domain,
>>>>>> bad account, etc. Since SMTP is a asynchronous process, I'm thinking
>>>>>> building a service that the sender side can poll for the status of
>>>>>> previous
>>>>>> jobs.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anything already built in? Any ideas how to implement this? Always
>>>>>> appreciate it!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bing
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to