Wow, "Useless" is a pretty strong word and it appears it's a relative concept in this case. What you find useless is what we find useful. Anyway, why don't we change the tone of this email to be a bit more positive? How about we discuss the alternatives to James?
The reason we chose James over other products (over 3 years ago) was that it allowed us to write specialized business code in the Mailet using Java. We evaluated over 10 products and none of the other Email servers did that. Now things may have changed. Does anyone know of any comparable product that has Mailet like functionality? On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Darko Hojnik <hoj...@virtualizing.org>wrote: > Am 23.05.2011, 17:47 Uhr, schrieb Norman Maurer < > norman.mau...@googlemail.com>: > > > Am Montag, 23. Mai 2011 schrieb Darko Hojnik <hoj...@virtualizing.org>: >> >>> Am 21.05.2011, 16:55 Uhr, schrieb BobU <ruom...@gmail.com>: >>> >>> >>> >>> Judging from how little literature I've found about mailets and James in >>> general, I get the impression that James never took off. Is anyone using >>> it, >>> other than the two references (inVue and JSender) mentioned on the Apache >>> site? I'm wondering whether I should even start developing for this >>> server, >>> even though it looks like a great concept. >>> >>> >>> I will begin to work soon as possible to add propper LDAP support for >>> James. The current implementation is not good enough. I think without LDAP >>> there will be no space for James in a enterprise environment. The minimum >>> LDAP reference should be like Postfix or Exim. >>> >>> best regards >>> Darko Hojnik >>> >>> >> better LDAP support would really be a good thing. But Im currently >> busy with other stuff :( >> >> bye, >> Norman >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-user-unsubscr...@james.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: server-user-h...@james.apache.org >> >> > Thats my problem too. I've not very much time. I think that will takes some > months. But without proper LDAP is any work on James useless. I mean the > project James is complete useless. > It's hard to say, but it is like it is :/ You can't integrate it to other > services > But now it runs propper on FreeBSD :) > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-user-unsubscr...@james.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: server-user-h...@james.apache.org > >
