Using:

# jstack <pid>


Please take 3 within on minute ...

Bye,
Norman

2011/9/15 Zach Cox <[email protected]>:
> I had to restart James several times this morning so nothing is
> blocked at the moment.
>
> There is nothing indicated in the log files. Things look normal, and
> then they look like this:
>
> 2011-09-15 01:25:26  INFO smtpserver:? - ID=8443803 Connection
> established from x
> 2011-09-15 01:25:31  INFO smtpserver:? - ID=8443803 Successfully
> spooled mail Mail1316049931087-05b8199e-e01f-4d14-84d5-3d7ac2443bb3
> from x on x for [x]
> 2011-09-15 01:25:36  INFO smtpserver:? - ID=8443803 Connection closed for x
> 2011-09-15 01:25:47  INFO smtpserver:? - ID=11521429 Connection
> established from x
> 2011-09-15 01:25:48  INFO smtpserver:? - ID=11521429 Successfully
> spooled mail Mail1316049948254-abd67e8f-bafe-41ab-8eef-c551420fd56e
> from x on x for [x]
> 2011-09-15 01:25:48  INFO smtpserver:? - ID=11521429 Connection closed for x
> 2011-09-15 01:26:41  INFO smtpserver:? - ID=5675333 Connection
> established from x
> 2011-09-15 01:26:52  INFO smtpserver:? - ID=5675333 Successfully
> spooled mail Mail1316050012621-522b1f2a-2851-46fb-940c-711591f637cc
> from x on x for [x]
> 2011-09-15 01:26:57  INFO smtpserver:? - ID=5675333 Connection closed for x
> 2011-09-15 01:27:52  INFO smtpserver:? - ID=33404412 Connection
> established from localhost (127.0.0.1)
> 2011-09-15 01:27:52  INFO smtpserver:? - ID=33404412 Connection closed
> for localhost (127.0.0.1)
> 2011-09-15 01:28:12  INFO smtpserver:? - ID=11673762 Connection
> established from x
> 2011-09-15 01:28:22  INFO smtpserver:? - ID=11673762 Successfully
> spooled mail Mail1316050102393-6fcc21aa-8f32-4935-b0eb-df892d54a5e8
> from x on x for [x]
> 2011-09-15 01:28:27  INFO smtpserver:? - ID=11673762 Connection closed for x
>
> So every mail that comes in just gets spooled and not processed.
>
> When this starts happening again, what's the best way to take a thread
> dump from James?
>
> Thanks,
> Zach
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 8:13 AM, Norman Maurer
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> please take a thread-dump to see why its blocked...
>>
>> Anything in the logs ?
>>
>> Bye,
>> Norman
>>
>>
>> 2011/9/15 Zach Cox <[email protected]>:
>>> We upgraded to James 3.0-beta3 on Tuesday night. Things worked fine
>>> until around 9pm last night, where exactly the same problem started
>>> occurring: mail would get spooled, but not processed.  After
>>> restarting James, some of the mail was then processed successfully,
>>> but most was lost.
>>>
>>> We consider this an emergency situation for our company and need to
>>> find a resolution ASAP. What kind of information can we provide to
>>> help find a resolution? If financial resources need to be involved to
>>> find a resolution or move things along, that is an option.
>>>
>>> Any help is most greatly appreciated.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Zach
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Norman Maurer
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> No problems...
>>>>
>>>> If you still can replicate then please open a issue with a stack trace
>>>> attached..
>>>>
>>>> Bye,
>>>> Norman
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2011/9/13 Raju Buchi <[email protected]>:
>>>>> James 3.0-M2. I will try to stand up a new server with beta3 and see if I
>>>>> can replicate the issue.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>> - Raju
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Norman Maurer <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you use beta3 ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bye,
>>>>>> Norman
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2011/9/13 Raju Buchi <[email protected]>:
>>>>>> > Hello
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > We are also facing exactly the same issues. Tried to debug my custom
>>>>>> mailets
>>>>>> > and seems to be everything is working fine. Logs did not show any
>>>>>> exception
>>>>>> > messages except it will always spool a mail and will never attempt to
>>>>>> send
>>>>>> > it. i.e. all mails are stuck in the spool.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > - Raju
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Zach Cox <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >> We are having a severe problem with James 3.0-M2 where it will operate
>>>>>> >> correctly for hours or days, and then all of a sudden it will not
>>>>>> >> process a lot of the mail it spools.  Sometimes it will not process
>>>>>> >> *any* mail that it spools, and other times it will spool a bunch of
>>>>>> >> mail, and then process others seemingly at random.  I have to restart
>>>>>> >> James to get that spooled mail to be processed.  But even then,
>>>>>> >> sometimes the spooled mail is completely lost after a restart.  I have
>>>>>> >> seen several other threads lately with similar problems, but they
>>>>>> >> haven't helped our situation.
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> We do not store mail in James for personal accounts and we have IMAP &
>>>>>> >> POP3 disabled.  Every inbound email has one of two things done to it:
>>>>>> >>  - it is processed locally by custom mailets & matchers
>>>>>> >>  - or it is relayed to our corporate Google Apps account
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> A previous thread recommended checking all custom mailets and
>>>>>> >> matchers.  As far as I can tell, they are all working properly.  There
>>>>>> >> are no exceptions or errors in log/james-server.log, and in the
>>>>>> >> scenario where James spools some mail & processes others, the mail
>>>>>> >> that is processed is handled properly by our custom mailets &
>>>>>> >> matchers.
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> I've tried connecting to James JMX remotely via JConsole but have not
>>>>>> >> been able to connect.  Which port does James run JMX on?  Any help
>>>>>> >> with JMX would be appreciated.
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Does anyone have any other ideas about what we should look for?  I
>>>>>> >> noticed 3.0-beta3 is out now, were there fixes in beta3 related to
>>>>>> >> mail being spooled but not processed?
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Thanks,
>>>>>> >> Zach
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to