Long names are not a problem - unless you are a masochist still using a text 
editor and command-line compilation.

Sent from my iPhone

> On Apr 9, 2019, at 4:56 AM, Raphael OUAZANA <raphael.ouaz...@linagora.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Simon,
> 
> Thank you very much and sorry for the late reply.
> 
> I see nothing wrong with long names. Here I would just replace Specific by 
> PerRecipient as it is the common naming in James.
> 
> An alternative to your implementation would be to have specific mailets to 
> remove/search PerRecipient headers, and use mailet composability to check 
> both at one time. But I'm fine with your solution, don't hesitate to open a 
> PR for them.
> 
> Thanks,
> Raphaël.
> 
> Le 2019-04-01 22:34, Simon Levesque a écrit :
>> Hi Raphael,
>> I created a matcher and remover that take care of the per recipient
>> headers as well as the global ones. I copied the existing ones (with
>> their tests) and added the use cases for per recipient.
>> They are currently available there:
>>    *
>> https://github.com/foilen/james-extra-components/blob/master/src/main/java/com/foilen/james/components/mailet/RemoveHeaderGlobalAndSpecific.java
>>    *
>> https://github.com/foilen/james-extra-components/blob/master/src/test/java/com/foilen/james/components/mailet/RemoveHeaderGlobalAndSpecificTest.java
>>    *
>> https://github.com/foilen/james-extra-components/blob/master/src/main/java/com/foilen/james/components/matcher/HasHeaderGlobalAndSpecific.java
>>    *
>> https://github.com/foilen/james-extra-components/blob/master/src/test/java/com/foilen/james/components/matcher/HasHeaderGlobalAndSpecificTest.java
>> I would like to add them in the James project, so I will create a Jira
>> for them, but I wanted to know what names would you suggest? Mine are
>> pretty long, so I would like to know your thoughts.
>> Thanks
>> On Thu, 7 Mar 2019 at 10:05, Raphael OUAZANA
>> <raphael.ouaz...@linagora.com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> You are right HasHeader does not handle perRecipientHeaders.
>>> I'm not sure of the good solution for this: either you can modify
>>> HasHeader to return a list of recipients depending on
>>> perRecipientHeaders (a.), or you can write an other matcher (b.).
>>> Given the documentation I think (b.) would be more appropriate, but
>>> other advices are very welcome.
>>> Regards,
>>> Raphaël.
>>> Le 2019-03-06 12:55, Simon Levesque a écrit :
>>>> Hi,
>>>> I added that logic to add an header per recipient, but it is being
>>>> ignored by HasHeader .
>>>> E.g. in my logs, I can see:
>>>> INFO   | jvm 1    | 2019/03/06 11:44:48 | ---[Mail -
>>> Recipients]---
>>>> INFO   | jvm 1    | 2019/03/06 11:44:48 | suriv...@gmail.com
>>>> INFO   | jvm 1    | 2019/03/06 11:44:48 | si...@nnnn.com
>>>> INFO   | jvm 1    | 2019/03/06 11:44:48 | ---[Mail - Headers Per
>>>> Recipient]---
>>>> INFO   | jvm 1    | 2019/03/06 11:44:48 | si...@nnnn.com :
>>>> isRedirection -> true
>>>> and
>>>> <mailet match="HasHeader=isRedirection"
>>>> class="com.foilen.james.components.mailet.LogInfo">
>>>> <text>Recipient is ExactAndCatchAllRedirections</text>
>>>> </mailet>
>>>> is not catching it. If I put the header on the message itself,
>>> then it
>>>> is getting it.
>>>> Is it a bug in the matcher? Should I use another matcher?
>>>> thanks
>>>> On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 at 10:06, Simon Levesque <suriv...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Great, i will try that.
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> Le lun. 4 mars 2019 08:02, Raphael OUAZANA
>>>>> <raphael.ouaz...@linagora.com> a écrit :
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> Le 2019-03-04 13:16, Simon Levesque a écrit :
>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>> I created a mailet that modifies some recipients. When
>>> modifying
>>>>>> them,
>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>> want to add an header only to those modified.
>>>>>>> Given the method's signature:
>>>>>>> public void service(Mail mail) throws MessagingException {
>>>>>>> It looks like I can only modify one mail.
>>>>>>> From the documentation, I recal that if one message has 5
>>>>>> recipients,
>>>>>>> then
>>>>>>> they would be splited in 5 messages (one per recipient) and
>>>>>> being
>>>>>>> processed
>>>>>>> individually, but in pratice, I am not seing that.
>>>>>>> Is there a way to do any of these:
>>>>>>> 1. configure something to have one mail per recipient
>>>>>>> 2. from a mailet, split a mail in 2 or call a service to
>>>>>> create a
>>>>>>> new
>>>>>>> mail
>>>>>> Something has been added recently exactly for this purpose:
>>>>>> perRecipientHeaders.
>>>>>> See Mail.addSpecificHeaderForRecipient and
>>>>>> Mail.getPerRecipientSpecificHeaders.
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Raphaël Ouazana.
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-user-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: server-user-h...@james.apache.org
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-user-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-user-h...@james.apache.org

Reply via email to