Hello Amlan,

On 30/07/2021 16:46, Amlan Sengupta wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Using : Apache James Server 3.6.0
> OS : RHEL 7
> JDK : OpenJDK 11
>
> I understand from the community that
>
> "With gateway mode turned on, we no longer need per-domain delivery
> and can group deliveries (this would reduce network exchanges /
> connection overhead). "
This statement missed the `Given extra development` prefix. This cannot
be configured as of today.

We (I) would be glad to welcome contributions on a
RemotreDeliveryThroughGateway mailet that reuses connections and that do
not split emails per domain.

I can also provide (commercial) assistance doing so, if you need to.

Regards,

Benoit
>
> The question is, is there a way to do it through configuration to minimise 
> connection over head ? I am looking at 
> https://james.apache.org/server/3/config-domainlist.html but the config is 
> not very obvious from this.
>
> Amlan
>
>
>
>
> On 13/07/2021, 11:21, "btell...@apache.org" <btell...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>     Hello Amlan,
>
>     Could you please share your remote delivery configuration in
>     mailetcontainer.xml? Have you been configuring it as a SMTP gateway?
>
>     I noticed this too in a performance enhancement session with flame
>     graphs. To be fairly honest the code paths handling direct resolution
>     and gateway resolution are relying on the very same code path,
>     preventing efforts to pool the underlying SMTP transports and do
>     effectively connection pooling.
>
>     I think this could be achieved by segregating the two use cases and
>     actually write two transport layers (both relying on javax.mail), one
>     doing just direct resolution with connection churn, one achieving
>     gateway forward with good connection pooling.
>
>     Also with gateway mode turned on, we no longer need per-domain delivery
>     and can group deliveries (this would reduce network exchanges /
>     connection overhead).
>
>     We can discuss those more these technical details. I would personally
>     more than welcome contribution on the topic of "Outgoing SMTP connection
>     reuse when gateway mode is active". I would also be happy to be
>     sponsored to contribute it.
>
>     Cheers,
>
>     Benoit
>
>     On 13/07/2021 16:18, Amlan Sengupta wrote:
>     > Hello,
>     >
>     > We are seeing something very strange with Apache James MTA.
>     >
>     > Keeping the flow below in context, we have a client which only uses 1 
> connection ad reuses it send emails to Apache James. We have confirmed this 
> through connection tracking. We are seeing Apache James spawning up to 60 
> connections.
>     >
>     > Flow :
>     > Docker Client ---- ( 1 connection : 60 emails ) ----> Apache James ( 
> MTA ) on Docker ---( spawning 60  new connections ) ->   SMTP Gateway.
>     >
>     > Configuration:
>     > I have sent the following to 1 and retested. It still behaves the same 
> way.
>     >
>     > MTA_SPOOL_THREADS=1
>     > MTA_DELIVERY_THREADS=1
>     >
>     >
>     > <!-- Number of spool threads -->
>     >
>     > <spooler>
>     >
>     >       <threads>${env:MTA_SPOOL_THREADS}</threads>
>     >
>     >         
> <errorRepository>file:///deployments/logs/mail/error/</errorRepository>
>     >
>     > </spooler>
>     >
>     > <!-- The number of threads that should be trying to deliver outgoing 
> messages -->
>     > <deliveryThreads>${env:MTA_DELIVERY_THREADS}</deliveryThreads>
>     >
>     >
>     > Objective here is limit the no of connections made to SMTPGateway.
>     >
>     > Any guidance ? Amlan
>     >
>     >
>     > ---
>     > This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If 
> you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) 
> please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. Any unauthorized 
> copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is 
> strictly forbidden.
>     >
>     > Please refer to https://www.db.com/disclosures for additional EU 
> corporate and regulatory disclosures and to 
> http://www.db.com/unitedkingdom/content/privacy.htm for information about 
> privacy.
>
>     ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>     To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-user-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
>     For additional commands, e-mail: server-user-h...@james.apache.org
>
>
>
>
> ---
> This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you 
> are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please 
> notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. Any unauthorized 
> copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is 
> strictly forbidden.
>
> Please refer to https://www.db.com/disclosures for additional EU corporate 
> and regulatory disclosures and to 
> http://www.db.com/unitedkingdom/content/privacy.htm for information about 
> privacy.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-user-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: server-user-h...@james.apache.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-user-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-user-h...@james.apache.org

Reply via email to