Hi everyone,


This new version, v3, of the ballot SC66 covers the change requested in 
Inconsistent document formatting (Markdown vs PDF) · Issue #462 · 
cabforum/servercert 
(github.com)<https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/issues/462> so we can start 
another round of discussion on this clean-up ballot.



Regards



Purpose of Ballot



This ballot proposes updates to the Baseline Requirements for the Issuance and 
Management of Publicly-Trusted Certificates related to the issues and typos 
that have happened due to the different updates of the document.



Notes:

*       The majority of these issues have been documented in GitHub and have 
therefore labeled as cleanup and have been the basis for this update.
*       Some have been provided by emails to the CABF lists and included in 
this reviewed version because were typos.



The following motion has been proposed by Iñigo Barreira of Sectigo. And, 
endorsed by Aaron Gable of Let´s Encrypt and Clint Wilson of Apple.



- Motion Begins -



This ballot modifies the "Baseline Requirements for the Issuance and Management 
of Publicly-Trusted Certificates" ("Baseline Requirements"), based on Version 
2.0.1.



MODIFY the Baseline Requirements as specified in the following Pull Request:

Comparing 
90a98dc7c1131eaab01af411968aa7330d315b9b...d2ad035a4acb3ee78d7f4713afd0479892bda08d
 · cabforum/servercert 
(github.com)<https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/compare/90a98dc7c1131eaab01af411968aa7330d315b9b...d2ad035a4acb3ee78d7f4713afd0479892bda08d>



- Motion Ends -





This ballot proposes a Final Maintenance Guideline. The procedure for approval 
of this ballot is as follows:



Discussion (7 days)

*                     Start time: 6-11-2023 12:00:00 UTC

*                     End time: 13-11-2023 12:00:00 UTC



Vote for approval (7 days)

*                     Start time: TBD

*                     End time: TBD



_______________________________________________
Servercert-wg mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg

Reply via email to