Thanks, Inigo! I've started a new voting period here: https://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/servercert-wg/2024-February/004202.html
Aaron On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 8:31 AM Inigo Barreira <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Aaron, > > > > I think so. The SCWG charter does not say anything about it but the CABF > bylaws indicate the following under section 2.3 General provisions > applicable to all ballots: > > 1. Any Voting Representative can call for a proposed ballot to be > published for discussion and comment by the membership. Any proposed ballot > needs endorsements by at least one (1) Voting Representative from two (2) > other Voting Members in order to proceed. The discussion period then shall > take place for at least seven (7) calendar days before votes are cast. At > any time, a new version of the ballot (marked with a distinguishing version > number) may be posted by the proposer in the same manner as the original. > Once no new version of the ballot has been posted for seven (7) calendar > days, the proposer may end the discussion period and start the voting > period by reposting the final version of the ballot and clearly > indicating that voting is to begin, along with the start and end dates and > times (including time zone) for the voting period. The ballot > automatically fails if ninety (90) calendar days elapse since the proposer > last posted a version of the ballot and the voting period has not been > started. > 2. Upon commencement of the voting period, Voting Members shall have > exactly seven (7) calendar days for voting on the proposed ballot, with the > deadline clearly communicated in the ballot and sent via a Public Mail > List. > A proposer may withdraw a ballot containing defective language at any point > during the voting period. For ballots related to the Forum level, votes > must be sent to the Public Mail List of the Forum. For ballots related to a > CWG, votes must be sent to the Public Mail List of the CWG. All voting will > take place via a Public Mail List. Votes must be submitted by a Voting > Representative to the correct Public Mail List by the end of the voting > period (as specified in the ballot) to be considered valid and counted. > Each Voting Member, and not the Forum or CWG, will be responsible for > taking precautions to make sure such Member’s vote is submitted properly > and counted. In the event that a Voting Member’s vote on a ballot is not > submitted properly, such vote shall not be valid and shall not be counted > for any purpose, and there shall be no appeal, re-vote (except in the case > of a new ballot submitted to all Voting Members) or other recourse. > > > > I think it´s not “clearly indicating” even though it´s an obvious typo. So > I´d suggest to start the voting period again. > > Regards > > > > > > *De:* Servercert-wg <[email protected]> *En nombre de *Aaron > Gable via Servercert-wg > *Enviado el:* martes, 13 de febrero de 2024 17:23 > *Para:* Mads Egil Henriksveen <[email protected]> > *CC:* CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List < > [email protected]> > *Asunto:* Re: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins] SC-070: Clarify the > use of DTPs for Domain Control Validation > > > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not > click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know > the content is safe. > > > > My apologies, that was an obvious typo. Chairs, is that the kind of typo > that requires the voting period to restart? > > > > Thanks, > > Aaron > > > > On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 10:29 PM Mads Egil Henriksveen < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Buypass votes YES on ballot SC-070. > > > > The vote period end should be changed to 2024-02-19. > > > Regards > > Mads > > > > *From:* Servercert-wg <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of > *Aaron > Gable via Servercert-wg > *Sent:* Monday, February 12, 2024 11:56 PM > *To:* CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List < > [email protected]> > *Subject:* [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins] SC-070: Clarify the use > of DTPs for Domain Control Validation > > > > This ballot aims to clarify the existing language around the use of > delegated third-parties during domain and IP address control validation. It > leaves the existing language in place, and adds specifics for the cases of > DNS queries, WHOIS lookups, and contact with the Domain Name Registrat or > IP Address Registration Authority. > > > > Additionally, it places these same restrictions on CAA checking, with an > effective date of 2024-05-15. > > > > This ballot is proposed by Aaron Gable (ISRG / Let's Encrypt) and endorsed > by Mads Henriksveen (Buypass) and Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA). You can > view and comment on the github pull request representing this ballot here: > https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/puhttps://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/servercert-wg/2024-February/004174.htmlll/475 > <https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fcabforum%2Fservercert%2Fpull%2F475&data=05%7C02%7Cinigo.barreira%40sectigo.com%7Cb3a6232e2f914867ad8b08dc2cb00c12%7C0e9c48946caa465d96604b6968b49fb7%7C0%7C0%7C638434381832453330%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=DYgOhQ9EFzyPJYav3IyRhR3GJl%2F5RFxU9P7BaPx0A8I%3D&reserved=0> > > > > The preceding discussion can be seen here: > https://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/servercert-wg/2024-February/004174.html > <https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.cabforum.org%2Fpipermail%2Fservercert-wg%2F2024-February%2F004174.html&data=05%7C02%7Cinigo.barreira%40sectigo.com%7Cb3a6232e2f914867ad8b08dc2cb00c12%7C0e9c48946caa465d96604b6968b49fb7%7C0%7C0%7C638434381832463512%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=st9S2hwqrR62w8XyfNUDH2Ym8gNum1A2zdTLNB84T2k%3D&reserved=0> > > > > --- Motion Begins --- > > > > This ballot modifies the "Baseline Requirements for the Issuance and > Management of Publicly-Trusted Certificates" ("Baseline Requirements") > based on Version 2.0.2 > > > > MODIFY the Baseline Requirements as specified in the following redline: > https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/compare/41f01640748fa612386f8b1a3031cd1bff3d4f35...00ea6e24c474fd0ab6eecc25cb8eb733fffc60c3 > <https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fcabforum%2Fservercert%2Fcompare%2F41f01640748fa612386f8b1a3031cd1bff3d4f35...00ea6e24c474fd0ab6eecc25cb8eb733fffc60c3&data=05%7C02%7Cinigo.barreira%40sectigo.com%7Cb3a6232e2f914867ad8b08dc2cb00c12%7C0e9c48946caa465d96604b6968b49fb7%7C0%7C0%7C638434381832471939%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=fphuOtmY6j0gv3b2hXnVzCi2VKMXDK3quYKuw0HZkxw%3D&reserved=0> > > > > --- Motion Ends --- > > > > Discussion (at least 7 days): > > - Start: 2024-02-02 22:30 UTC > > - End: 2024-02-12 22:30 UTC > > > > Vote for approval (7 days): > > - Start: 2024-02-12 22:30 UTC > > - End: 2024-02-09 22:30 UTC > >
_______________________________________________ Servercert-wg mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg
