Disig votes "YES" on  Ballot SC-070: Clarify the use of DTPs for Domain Control 
Validation.

Regards
Peter Miskovic


-----Original Message-----
From: Servercert-wg <[email protected]> On Behalf Of 
[email protected]
Sent: utorok 13. februára 2024 17:58
To: [email protected]
Subject: Servercert-wg Digest, Vol 68, Issue 31

Send Servercert-wg mailing list submissions to
        [email protected]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        [email protected]

You can reach the person managing the list at
        [email protected]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: 
Contents of Servercert-wg digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. [Voting Period Begins] SC-070: Clarify the use of DTPs for
      Domain Control Validation (Aaron Gable)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 08:56:39 -0800
From: Aaron Gable <[email protected]>
To: "CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List"
        <[email protected]>
Subject: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins] SC-070: Clarify the
        use of DTPs for Domain Control Validation
Message-ID:
        <CAEmnErcsUCkUqRVBP5Gzu2-dMJWQ_0F=rvng7+_a1az0u7p...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

This new voting period is to fix a typo in the End timestamp of the voting 
period for the previous version of this ballot. The contents of the motion 
itself are identical. My apologies for the confusion.

This ballot aims to clarify the existing language around the use of delegated 
third-parties during domain and IP address control validation. It leaves the 
existing language in place, and adds specifics for the cases of DNS queries, 
WHOIS lookups, and contact with the Domain Name Registrat or IP Address 
Registration Authority.

Additionally, it places these same restrictions on CAA checking, with an 
effective date of 2024-05-15.

This ballot is proposed by Aaron Gable (ISRG / Let's Encrypt) and endorsed by 
Mads Henriksveen (Buypass) and Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA). You can view 
and comment on the github pull request representing this ballot here:
https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/puhttps://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/servercert-wg/2024-February/004174.htmlll/475
<https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/pull/475>

The preceding discussion can be seen here:
https://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/servercert-wg/2024-February/004174.html

--- Motion Begins ---

This ballot modifies the "Baseline Requirements for the Issuance and Management 
of Publicly-Trusted Certificates" ("Baseline Requirements") based on Version 
2.0.2

MODIFY the Baseline Requirements as specified in the following redline:
https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/compare/41f01640748fa612386f8b1a3031cd1bff3d4f35...00ea6e24c474fd0ab6eecc25cb8eb733fffc60c3

--- Motion Ends ---

Discussion (at least 7 days):
- Start: 2024-02-02 22:30 UTC
- End: 2024-02-12 22:30 UTC

Vote for approval (7 days):
- Start: 2024-02-13 17:00 UTC
- End: 2024-02-20 17:00 UTC

Thanks,
Aaron

_______________________________________________
Servercert-wg mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg

Reply via email to