DigiCert votes YES on SC-65v2.
While the ballot motion contains a potentially confusing redline link, it does not affect the actual text changes introduced by the ballot. Additionally, the reformat proposed by this ballot is valuable in getting us closer to consistently formatted documents, so it is good to not delay this work further. Moving forward, it would be useful to develop guidance for ballot authors on how redline links should be created to ensure that proposed changes are clearly communicated. Thanks, Corey From: Servercert-wg <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Inigo Barreira via Servercert-wg Sent: Monday, March 4, 2024 10:34 AM To: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List <[email protected]> Subject: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins]: SC65: Convert EVGs into RFC 3647 format v2 Summary: The Extended Validation Certificates guidelines (EVGs) were developed and written in a specific format. Since then, the RFC 3647 has been the basis (and the de-facto standard) for the CA/Browser Forum to develop other documents. This ballot aims to update the EVGs to follow the RFC 3647 format without changing any content, just moving current sections to those defined in the RFC 3647. There are no normative requirements changes. This change also affects the Baseline Requirements for TSL certificates (BRs) which needs to point to the new sections of the EVGs. Both documents will be updated according to the latest version published. This ballot is proposed by Iñigo Barreira (Sectigo) and endorsed by Pedro Fuentes (OISTE) and Ben Wilson (Mozilla). --- Motion Begins --- This ballot modifies the Baseline Requirements for the Issuance and Management of Publicly-Trusted TLS Certificates" ("TLS Baseline Requirements"), based on Version 2.0.2 and the Guidelines for the Issuance and Management of Extended Validation Certificates (EVGs) based on Version 1.8.0. MODIFY the TLS EVGs and BRs as specified in the following Redline: <https://url.avanan.click/v2/___https:/github.com/cabforum/servercert/compar e/90a98dc7c1131eaab01af411968aa7330d315b9b...dedeebfe036fa5a6f0d7ae985ea0831 7ba60b8cb___.YXAzOmRpZ2ljZXJ0OmE6bzoyMGJlODM5Nzg2ZTZiZGMwYmIzNWJkYjlkNTlmODI zNzo2OmJmYzQ6M2ZmYmYyMjViOTNlYjQ3MWYwNTZkOTU5YjY1YTFiYmQwZmQ4ZTY2OWMyOGM3YWV kNDRlNTgzNTM1OWU4MWQ3MzpoOkY> Comparing 90a98dc7c1131eaab01af411968aa7330d315b9b...dedeebfe036fa5a6f0d7ae985ea08317b a60b8cb · cabforum/servercert (github.com) --- Motion Ends --- This ballot proposes a Final Maintenance Guideline for the BRs and EVGs. The procedure for approval of this ballot is as follows: Discussion (at least 7 days) 1. Start time: 2024-02-20 17:00:00 UTC 2. End time: not before 2024-03-04 15:00:00 UTC Vote for approval (7 days) 1. Start time: 2024-03-04 15:30:00 UTC 2. End time: 2024-03-11 15:30:00 UTC
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Servercert-wg mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg
