Issues
------
* cabforum/servercert (+2/-3/💬13)
2 issues created:
- Update to description of certificateHold (by dougbeattie)
https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/issues/506
- Making CRLs required and OCSP Optional (by dougbeattie)
https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/issues/505
7 issues received 13 new comments:
- #506 Update to description of certificateHold (5 by clintwilson,
dougbeattie, robstradling, timfromdigicert)
https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/issues/506
- #505 Making CRLs required and OCSP Optional (3 by XolphinMartijn, clintwilson, wthayer)
https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/issues/505
- #229 BRs: Clarify what "an appropriate way" means for wildcards and gTLDs (1 by dzacharo)
https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/issues/229 [enhancement] [baseline-requirements]
- #193 Standardize on date format for date of incorporation or registration (1 by barrini)
https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/issues/193 [ev-guidelines]
- #187 Baseline Requirements: Should Technically Constrained Sub CAs require a Key Generation report? (1 by barrini)
https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/issues/187 [enhancement] [baseline-requirements]
- #160 Baseline Requirements: nameConstraints definition is ambiguous (1 by barrini)
https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/issues/160 [baseline-requirements]
- #153 Clarify validation requirements for .arpa (1 by barrini)
https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/issues/153 [baseline-requirements] [validation-sc]
3 issues closed:
- BR Certificate Policy OIDS are no longer optional https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/issues/248 [baseline-requirements] [clean-up]
- BRs: Clarify what "an appropriate way" means for wildcards and gTLDs https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/issues/229 [enhancement] [baseline-requirements]
- Baseline Requirements: Clarify the allowed fields for issuer names https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/issues/154 [baseline-requirements]
Pull requests
-------------
* cabforum/servercert (+3/-1/💬1)
3 pull requests submitted:
- SC-067 V2: Require Multi-Perspective Issuance Corroboration (Version 2) (by
ChristopherRC)
https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/pull/507
- SC-071 V2 - Incorporating V1 feedback (by DustinHollenback-Microsoft)
https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/pull/504
- Ballot SC74: Clarify that CAs must follow the outline of Section 6 of RFC 3647 for CP/CPS documents (by dzacharo)
https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/pull/503 [baseline-requirements] [ballot]
1 pull requests received 1 new comments:
- #487 SC-067: Require Multi-Perspective Issuance Corroboration (Version 1) (1
by ChristopherRC)
https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/pull/487 [ballot]
1 pull requests merged:
- SC-071 V2 - Incorporating V1 feedback
https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/pull/504
Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/cabforum/servercert
_______________________________________________
Servercert-wg mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg
