Entrust votes No to ballot SC-74.

Bruce.

From: Servercert-wg <servercert-wg-boun...@cabforum.org> On Behalf Of Bruce 
Morton via Servercert-wg
Sent: Monday, May 6, 2024 8:24 AM
To: Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) <dzach...@harica.gr>; CA/B Forum Server 
Certificate WG Public Discussion List <servercert-wg@cabforum.org>
Subject: Re: [Servercert-wg] [EXTERNAL] [Voting Begins] Ballot SC-74 - Clarify 
CP/CPS structure according to RFC 3647

Entrust votes Yes to ballot SC-74. Bruce. From: Servercert-wg 
<servercert-wg-bounces@ cabforum. org> On Behalf Of Dimitris Zacharopoulos 
(HARICA) via Servercert-wg Sent: Sunday, May 5, 2024 4: 24 AM To: CA/B Forum 
Server Certificate WG Public

Entrust votes Yes to ballot SC-74.


Bruce.

From: Servercert-wg 
<servercert-wg-boun...@cabforum.org<mailto:servercert-wg-boun...@cabforum.org>> 
On Behalf Of Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) via Servercert-wg
Sent: Sunday, May 5, 2024 4:24 AM
To: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List 
<servercert-wg@cabforum.org<mailto:servercert-wg@cabforum.org>>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Servercert-wg] [Voting Begins] Ballot SC-74 - Clarify 
CP/CPS structure according to RFC 3647

Voting begins for ballot SC-74. SC-74 - Clarify CP/CPS structure according to 
RFC 3647 Summary The TLS Baseline Requirements require in section 2. 2 that: 
"The Certificate Policy and/or Certification Practice Statement MUST be 
structured in

Voting begins for ballot SC-74.
SC-74 - Clarify CP/CPS structure according to RFC 3647
Summary

The TLS Baseline Requirements require in section 2.2 that:

"The Certificate Policy and/or Certification Practice Statement MUST be 
structured in accordance with RFC 3647 and MUST include all material required 
by RFC 3647."

The intent of this language was to ensure that all CAs' CP and/or CPS documents 
contain a similar structure, making it easier to review and compare against the 
BRs. However, there was some ambiguity as to the actual structure that CAs 
should follow. After several discussions in the SCWG Public Mailing 
List<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/servercert-wg/2023-November/004070.html__;!!FJ-Y8qCqXTj2!cKscdErif35z9080I4qUNWiEBkbcvZAU-O348aNPTbBukz2D3MHzp0nkdYntRGQwKmkvU9BasOrNQkRehWXosH6umUupfg$>
 and F2F meetings, it was agreed that more clarity should be added to the 
existing requirement, pointing to the outline described in section 6 of RFC 
3647.

The following motion has been proposed by Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) and 
endorsed by Aaron Poulsen (Amazon) and Tim Hollebeek (Digicert).

You can view the github pull request representing this ballot 
here<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/cabforum/servercert/pull/503__;!!FJ-Y8qCqXTj2!cKscdErif35z9080I4qUNWiEBkbcvZAU-O348aNPTbBukz2D3MHzp0nkdYntRGQwKmkvU9BasOrNQkRehWXosH41qyhIwg$>.

Motion Begins

MODIFY the "Baseline Requirements for the Issuance and Management of 
Publicly-Trusted TLS Server Certificates" based on Version 2.0.4 as specified 
in the following redline:

  *   
https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/compare/c4a34fe2292022e0a04ba66b5a85df75907ac2a2...f6a90e2a652fbb7a2d62a976b70f4af3adce8dae<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/cabforum/servercert/compare/c4a34fe2292022e0a04ba66b5a85df75907ac2a2...f6a90e2a652fbb7a2d62a976b70f4af3adce8dae__;!!FJ-Y8qCqXTj2!cKscdErif35z9080I4qUNWiEBkbcvZAU-O348aNPTbBukz2D3MHzp0nkdYntRGQwKmkvU9BasOrNQkRehWXosH5EAlr0SA$>

Motion Ends

This ballot proposes a Final Maintenance Guideline. The procedure for approval 
of this ballot is as follows:

Discussion (at least 7 days)

  *   Start time: 2024-04-25 16:30:00 UTC
  *   End time: on or after 2024-05-02 16:30:00 UTC

Vote for approval (7 days)

  *   Start time: 2024-05-05 8:30:00 UTC
  *   End time: 2024-05-12 8:30:00 UTC

Any email and files/attachments transmitted with it are intended solely for the 
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If this message has 
been sent to you in error, you must not copy, distribute or disclose of the 
information it contains. Please notify Entrust immediately and delete the 
message from your system.
_______________________________________________
Servercert-wg mailing list
Servercert-wg@cabforum.org
https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg

Reply via email to