D-TRUST votes ’yes‘ on Ballot SC-078
KR,
Andreas
Von: Servercert-wg <[email protected]> Im Auftrag von Martijn
Katerbarg via Servercert-wg
Gesendet: Dienstag, 17. September 2024 15:20
An: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List
<[email protected]>
Betreff: [Servercert-wg] Voting Period Begins: Ballot SC-078 - Subject
organizationName alignment for DBA / Assumed Name
Summary
The TLS Baseline Requirements currently state an OV certificate may contain
either a DBA / Assumed Name or Legal Name. The EVGs and SBRs allow for the
common format of "DBA (Legal Name)". This ballot aims to align the practices
for OV certificates with this.
While still allowing the inclusion of the sole DBA / Assumed Name, it will also
allow for the "DBA (Legal Name)" format to be used, allowing CAs to align
practices with the EVG and SBRs.
The following motion has been proposed by Martijn Katerbarg (Sectigo) and
endorsed by Clint Wilson (Apple) and Enrico Entschew (D-Trust).
Motion Begins
MODIFY the "Baseline Requirements for the Issuance and Management of
Publicly-Trusted Certificates" ("Baseline Requirements") based on Version 2.0.7
as specified in the following redline:
https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/compare/ba28d04894d69c8fac62850b9d0de5061658c7c5...d69373c35ff72121a912b69b060ff89f32d41383
Motion Ends
This ballot proposes a Final Maintenance Guideline. The procedure for approval
of this ballot is as follows:
Discussion (at least 7 days)
* Start time: 2024-09-10 13:00 UTC
* End time: 2024-09-17 13:20 UTC
Vote for approval (7 days)
* Start time: 2024-09-17 13:20 UTC
* End time: 2024-09-24 13:20 UTC
--- Begin Message ---
D-TRUST votes ’yes‘ on Ballot SC-078
KR,
Andreas
Von: Servercert-wg <[email protected]> Im Auftrag von Martijn
Katerbarg via Servercert-wg
Gesendet: Dienstag, 17. September 2024 15:20
An: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List
<[email protected]>
Betreff: [Servercert-wg] Voting Period Begins: Ballot SC-078 - Subject
organizationName alignment for DBA / Assumed Name
Summary
The TLS Baseline Requirements currently state an OV certificate may contain
either a DBA / Assumed Name or Legal Name. The EVGs and SBRs allow for the
common format of "DBA (Legal Name)". This ballot aims to align the practices
for OV certificates with this.
While still allowing the inclusion of the sole DBA / Assumed Name, it will also
allow for the "DBA (Legal Name)" format to be used, allowing CAs to align
practices with the EVG and SBRs.
The following motion has been proposed by Martijn Katerbarg (Sectigo) and
endorsed by Clint Wilson (Apple) and Enrico Entschew (D-Trust).
Motion Begins
MODIFY the "Baseline Requirements for the Issuance and Management of
Publicly-Trusted Certificates" ("Baseline Requirements") based on Version 2.0.7
as specified in the following redline:
https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/compare/ba28d04894d69c8fac62850b9d0de5061658c7c5...d69373c35ff72121a912b69b060ff89f32d41383
Motion Ends
This ballot proposes a Final Maintenance Guideline. The procedure for approval
of this ballot is as follows:
Discussion (at least 7 days)
* Start time: 2024-09-10 13:00 UTC
* End time: 2024-09-17 13:20 UTC
Vote for approval (7 days)
* Start time: 2024-09-17 13:20 UTC
* End time: 2024-09-24 13:20 UTC
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
Servercert-wg mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg
