I'm sorry to say that I can't find a report I've written that makes this
point very very very clear. I think I need to fix that. Most of my
presentations on SOA make this point clear, but looking through my reports,
I see that I have not been quite so clear. The point is made -- but it's
much more subtle.

Sorry about that.

On 7/8/07, Steve Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

  +1

Out of interest Anne, is there a report I can quote that makes this point
very very very clear to clients?

Steve



On 07/07/07, Anne Thomas Manes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>   I would add another: Treating SOA like a technology initiative rather
> than a business initiative.
>
> Anne
>
>
> On 7/6/07, Gervas Douglas < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >   <<Sandra Gittlen, writing in Datamation, explored "three ways to
> > avoid
> > SOA snafus.* Here are the three biggest snafus and how to address
> > them:
> >
> > 1. Operating in a vacuum. SOA is an enterprise project, and should be
> > managed as such. "You have to really get everyone on board -- from the
> > programmers to the shareholders to the end users -- to be successful
> > with SOA."
> >
> > 2. Not creating a governance framework. Governance is a large part of
> > developing an SOA strategy, and organizations must decide ahead of
> > time what their reuse and publication policies will be for the
> > services within their architecture."
> >
> > 3. Treating security as an afterthought. "Security can be one of the
> > trickiest areas of SOA because organizations are reusing services that
> > might have been created externally. "Most services, to be made as
> > reusable as possible, have security stripped out of them. This isn't
> > good." IT groups should add service interfaces that address compliance
> > mandates and cater to the highest level of security each application
> > requires. "n addition, IT groups should carefully plot out their
> > authorization and authentication strategies."
> >
> > I would like to add a fourth bit of advice, which Sandra mentioned in
> > the article but did not elevate to a "Big Mistake:"
> >
> > 4. Pushing SOA through as a massive enterprise initiative. That's sort
> > of like, as they say, trying to "boil the ocean." SOA should be
> > introduced incrementally, starting out with quick wins to demonstrate
> > its value to the rest of the organization. If SOA is launched as this
> > galactic transformative mega-project, constituents will be quickly
> > disappointed when they don't see mega-results to their areas of the
> > business.>>
> >
> > You can read this at:
> >
> > http://www.soainaction.com/blog/2007/06/the_three_biggest_soa_mistakes.php
> >
> >
> > Gervas
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to