No takers, eh? Too open-ended of a query I suppose. Or too basic. Here's another one then:
How would you describe the difference between "mediation" and "simple integration?" This one is prompted from a quote of Jason Bloomberg in http://searchwebservices.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid26 _gci1265400,00.html?track=sy80&asrc=RSS_RSS-8_80 The implication is that mediation is more desirable than simple integration. What would qualify as a "simple integration" tool? -Rob --- In [email protected], "Rob Eamon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Perhaps this has been covered before... > > The article "SOA 2007: Adoption steady, but tech squabbles exist" > at Http://searchwebservices.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid26 _g > ci1263727,00.html?track=sy80 contains a quote from Ron Schmelzer of > ZapThink: > > "Many end-users are being misled with regards to proper SOA > adoption - focusing them more on implementing new infrastructure > and not as much on building well-architected services." > > What does "well-architected services" mean to you? > > -Rob >
