I'm saying that SOA is about the architecture and its impact on ALL of IT. So SOA certainly impacts implementation, it should in fact completely change implementation from being application and project centric to service lifecycle centric.
Technology is just the tools of the implementation, and personally I'd quite like the vendors to be grumpy and concentrate on getting software that does the basics well rather than continually adding string onto an unstable base. Steve 2008/6/13 Alexander Johannesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 08:44, Steve Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Even good planning if rewarded around project go-live will result in >> poor applications. The whole project development lifecycle is set up >> to create bad applications, even when planned well. > > So basically we need to say that SOA has *nothing* to do with > technology nor implementation. Wouldn't the vendors be a bit grumpy > about this? > > Alex > -- > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Project Wrangler, SOA, Information Alchemist, UX, RESTafarian, Topic Maps > ------------------------------------------ http://shelter.nu/blog/ -------- >
