My bad John, I thought that when you said "BPEL is a an orchestration language" that you meant "BPEL is an orchestration language".
I'll quit taking you so literally. If I understand you correctly what you meant to say is "BPEL is an orchestration language, however, we at Microsoft see it as an import/export representation, where you may lose semantic fidelity, because it wasn't designed to be an import/export language." Again, my bad - I thought that the "E" in BPEL stood for "execution" but I now remember, you're correct, it stands for "represenation". Cool to hear that "everybody is doing it..." Jeff --- In [email protected], "John Evdemon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 31 Aug 2008 at 19:38, jeffrschneider wrote: > > > Good to see that you've come around: > > http://tinyurl.com/6khvmu > > Not sure what your point is here. The fact that BizTalk uses BPEL as > an import/export representation doesn't make it unique - many tools > do this. >
