--- In [email protected], "Steve Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'm not sure I'd go that far, they are just dumb technical services, > like a database but with a friendlier interface.
"Friendlier" is debatable. A services interface to such components (not services) is of questionable value, IMO. Plus, such an approach tends to skew the focus as evidenced by this thread. > Business services should be, but there will be technical services > that are dumb and just doing the "muck" as Amazon put it. This > means they aren't important so concentrating effort there is just > mental. Agreed. I submit that those are not "services" but are instead technical implementation components. Calling everything a service is problmatic. -Rob
