|
Hiroshi, Do you have a test program for this problem? That would help with my analysis of the code paths... Dan Hiroshi Yamauchi wrote: There are two bugs: 1. A CompiledMethodLoad event is sent after the VM death event. 2. SetEventCallbacks and SetEventNotificationMode calls may not be respected because of the race condition/visibility issue.Delaying the posting of the VM death event will probably fix bug 1 and we can probably avoid using mutex locks in event posting. But I suspect that fixing bug 2 will need mutex locks after all. Is there a way around mutex locks here? Thanks, Hiroshi |
- Re: synchronization of JVMTI phase notifications [F... Daniel D. Daugherty
- Re: synchronization of JVMTI phase notificatio... Daniel D. Daugherty
- Re: synchronization of JVMTI phase notific... Hiroshi Yamauchi
- Re: synchronization of JVMTI phase notificatio... Hiroshi Yamauchi
- Re: synchronization of JVMTI phase notific... Paul Hohensee
- Re: synchronization of JVMTI phase not... Daniel D. Daugherty
- Re: synchronization of JVMTI phase notific... Swamy Venkataramanappa
- Re: synchronization of JVMTI phase not... Hiroshi Yamauchi
- Re: synchronization of JVMTI phase... Swamy Venkataramanappa
- Re: synchronization of JVMTI phase... Hiroshi Yamauchi
- Re: synchronization of JVMTI phase... Daniel D. Daugherty
- Re: synchronization of JVMTI phase... Hiroshi Yamauchi
