On 5/5/2011 6:21 AM, Keith McGuigan wrote:
It's the ™ character. (trademark, if that doesn't come through for some reason
on your mail client).
Keith, Joe Darcy said that the current way to represent tm in HTML is to use ™ instead of
#8482. Can you do that?
- jjh
Thanks for the review!
--
- Keith
On May 5, 2011, at 9:17 AM, Karen Kinnear wrote:
Keith,
Looks good. Only mismatch I found is the one David already caught.
In jvmti.xsl - line 1044 - what is #8482 for?
thanks for doing this,
Karen
On May 5, 2011, at 8:42 AM, Keith McGuigan wrote:
On May 4, 2011, at 11:18 PM, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Keith,
Keith McGuigan said the following on 05/05/11 11:10:
There has been a request for us to not link directly to the JVMS from the JVMTI spec
(especially using the old location in the java.sun.com domain, which will likely go away
someday). This change removes the hyperlinks to the JVMS from the JVMTI Specification and
replaces it with the proper legal name and (when applicable) the chapter number referred to.
I would appreciate any reviews.
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kamg/7033669/webrev.00/
There are a couple of places where you use "the <vmspec/>" and so get "the The"
in the output:
2627 Return the stack showing the <vmspec/>
2707 That is (using the <vmspec/> terminology):
11409 instruction as defined in the <vmspec/>. However, some
implementations
Ok, I'll change these. I was aware of this awkwardness but thought that since "The Virtual..."
was the title, that it made sense to refer to it as "the <title>", but I suppose these sentences
still work okay without the "the". (dang I did it again!)
This one seems to refer to the wrong Chapter/Section - Constant pool should be
4.4
Good catch - thanks I'll fix that.
--
- Keith
