Ah, you're right, i forgot the samples directory. And as for the text
being in each source file, that's how I undestood the requirement from
Aurelio after some email conversation. Looping him in and he might shed
some light on it.
As I understood
On 08/11/2011 05:58 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
Nils Loodin wrote:
Added a comment in each demo source file stating that the code below
is unfit for production.
Made a separate comment blog from the copyright one to make it stand
out more and be more warning-like :)
/Nisse
Nils - is it just demo code or do you plan to do this to sample code
too (sample code is in src/share/sample/**)? One thing that isn't
clear to me is why this needs to be added to every file. Seems like a
warning in each demo's README should be sufficient.
One specific file in the webrev that might need special treatment is
hprof_b_spec.h. That header file is essentially the "spec" to the
HPROF binary format (sad I know). It just seems a bit strange to add a
comment saying that it "has been deliberately simplified" to this file
specifically.
-Alan.
