On 17 mar 2012, at 23:47, David Holmes wrote: > On 16/03/2012 6:10 PM, Staffan Larsen wrote: >> Fixes have been verified in JPRT. > > How have the fixes been "verified" in JPRT? We would expect these tests to > pass in JPRT, where there should be no unknown Java processes. So how have we > verified that they work in the presence of unknown Java processes?
I meant "verified" in the sense that they do not break any existing tests in JPRT. The added functionality was verified manually on my machine. The tests initially failed in JPRT because of unknown Java processes. This was on mac osx and I think the process was a Firefox running a Java plugin. /Staffan
