Thanks

I dumped all the classes then manually checked with javap on some, the result is OK. Also used BCEL to verify some of the classes, some warnings, not a big deal. There is only one problem, but it is not important for SA usage, the StackMapTable is missed in class dump, anyway rt.jar file does not include that too.

For jtreg, we need a Verifier, first dump java classes from SA, then run Verifier against the output. For writing a verifier in java need much more time for me. So currently no plan to write a test case for this.

Thanks
Yumin

On 10/18/2012 2:17 PM, Coleen Phillimore wrote:

Yumin,
This looks okay. Did you write a test for this? Is there something that can be added to the (currently internal) nsk.sajdi.testlist tests that tests this functionality? It's probably not possible to add it to the jtreg tests.
thanks,
Coleen

On 10/18/2012 4:27 PM, [email protected] wrote:
 Hi, all

Add _invokehandle which is missed in SA. Its java code is _invokevirtual which already processed in ClassWriter.
  Same links.

Thanks
Yumin

On 10/17/2012 5:25 PM, Yumin Qi wrote:
Hi,

  As suggested by David, I created a new  bug
  8001055:  Bytes.swap should follow big endian
  to address the issued caused by 6879063 push.

  new webrevs:
  http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~minqi/8000818
  http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~minqi/8001055

Thanks
Yumin

On 10/16/2012 9:51 PM, Yumin Qi wrote:
Hi, all

  May I have your codereview on

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~minqi/8000818/ <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eminqi/8000818/>

8000818: SA constant pool need to reference to reference map after permgen removal Summary: After permgen removal, constant pool changed to put _ldc and _ldc_w (fast_ldc and fast_ldcw) index to reference map, no longer calculated via constant pool cache. Also, there is a mistake in 6879063: SA should use hsdis. Bytes.swap should only check if the underlying platform is big endian since java code follows big endian. Revert it back to its orginal form, else it will fail ClassDump.

Reviewed-by:
Contributed-by: [email protected]


Thanks
Yumin

Reply via email to