Please re-review the updated webrev http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jbachorik/8005472/webrev.06
I've replaced the shell script with the plain java test. The javac API is used to compile the the auxiliary classes as was recommended. This allowed to simplify the test. The test does not check for a certain string in the standard output anymore - it turns out that it is possible to count the number of all the received JMX notifications (even though some notifications can be lost, we receive a special notification with the number of the lost regular notifications). It is then possible to match the actual number of processed notifications (received + lost) against the expected number - different numbers mean that the notification processing thread had been interrupted unexpectedly. Thanks, -JB- On 8.2.2013 17:37, Chris Hegarty wrote: > >> Jon Gibbons suggested invoking the compiler API directly from java >> instead of writing a shell script. Doing this seems fairly simple, and I >> think it would be advantageous to keep things entirely in Java. I may >> attempt to rewrite the defaultSVID test using the compiler API. > > Here's a test that does just that. > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/file/2de8c6c2d652/test/sun/misc/JarIndex/metaInfFilenames/Basic.java > > > -Chris.
