Re: review request for JDK-8013461 There is a symbol AsyncGetCallTrace in libjvm.symbols that does not exist in minimal/libjvm.a when DEBUG_LEVEL == release

Mon, 20 May 2013 19:40:32 -0700 

<added servicability>

Hi Joe,
As I have previously stated you copied the struct definitions instead of moving them outside the ifdef.
Serviceability folk: we are particularly interested in whether the use of ticks_no_class_load is deemed appropriate in this situation. Who will be consuming this value? 

Thanks,
David

On 21/05/2013 5:10 AM, JOSEPH PROVINO wrote:

The change is to include forte.cpp in the minimal jvm but to
conditionalize the code so that
only AsyncGetCallTrace() is defined with the minimal jvm.

Webrev is here: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jprovino/8013461/webrev.00/

  * JDK-8013461 <https://jbs.oracle.com/bugs/browse/JDK-8013461>There is
    a symbol AsyncGetCallTrace in libjvm.symbols that does not exist in
    minimal/libjvm.a when DEBUG_LEVEL == release
    <https://jbs.oracle.com/bugs/browse/JDK-8013461>

Thanks.

joe

Reply via email to