Hi Dan,
On 9/16/13 11:10 AM, Gerald Thornbrugh wrote:
Hi Omair,
Hi Gerald,
On 09/16/2013 12:52 PM, Gerald Thornbrugh wrote:
Sorry about the delay of my response.
No problem :)
I chose to place the /etc/SuSE-release file in front of the
/etc/os-release file because the
SuSE-release file was more clear and concise than the os-release file.
I see. Yes, that does make a lot of sense.
I propose the following change:
2181 // Searching system-release (Red Hat) and os-release (other
linuxes) are a
2182 // next to last resort. The os-release file is a new standard
that
contains
2183 // distribution information and the os-release file seems to
be an
old standard
2184 // that has been replaced by the lsb-release and os-release
files.
There seems to be a thinko here: "The os-release file is a ... and the
os-release file seems to be ... that has been replaced by ..
os-release"
If you mean there are two different 'standards' for os-release, maybe
it's better to say that.
Thanks for the catch, I did mean "system-release" instead of
"os-release".
I will try this again:
2181 // Searching system-release (Red Hat) and os-release
(otherlinuxes) are a
Typo: "otherlinuxes" -> "other Linuxes"
OK, one more time:
2181 // Searching system-release (Red Hat) and os-release (other
Linuxes) are a
2182 // next to last resort. The os-release file is a new standard that
contains
2183 // distribution information and the system-release file seems to be
an old standard
2184 // that has been replaced by the lsb-release and os-release files.
Thanks!
Jerry
Dan
2182 // next to last resort. The os-release file is a new standard
that contains
2183 // distribution information and the system-release file seems to
be an old standard
2184 // that has been replaced by the lsb-release and os-release files.
Is this ok?
Thanks!
Jerry
Thanks,
Omair
