Sure, but we don’t assign owners until someone actively works on it so I put it as Unassigned.
(I didn’t understand that this was the question in the original conversation). /Staffan On 5 dec 2013, at 10:48, Alexandre (Shura) Iline <[email protected]> wrote: > Staffan, > > As it is not a test bug, could somebody else take ownership of it? > > Shura > > On 12/04/2013 01:36 PM, andrei.eremeev wrote: >> Is is not a test bug. >> Assign bug to someone from serviceability-dev and fix it. >> >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/2013-December/013459.html >> >> Andrei >> >> On 12/02/2013 09:10 PM, Staffan Larsen wrote: >>> JDK-6498631 is closed a dup of JDK-8004127, so I don’t think you can >>> close JDK-8004127. >>> >>> /Staffan >>> >>> On 29 nov 2013, at 13:18, andrei.eremeev <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I am analyzing this bug >>>> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8004127>. And I think that >>>> is is duplicate of JDK-6498631 >>>> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6498631>. >>>> Test hangs in native code. >>>> Can I close my bug as duplicate? >>>> >>>> Andrei
