Fancy!

new review: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sla/8046883/webrev.01/

/Staffan

On 18 jun 2014, at 13:59, Peter Allwin <peter.all...@oracle.com> wrote:

> This looks a lot better!
> 
> (Since we’re using fancy new features we could use streams to find the 
> connector instance)
> 
>         AttachingConnector ac = 
> Bootstrap.virtualMachineManager().attachingConnectors()
>             .stream()
>             .filter(c -> c.name().equals("com.sun.jdi.ProcessAttach"))
>             .findFirst()
>             .orElseThrow(() -> new RuntimeException("Unable to locate 
> ProcessAttachingConnector"));
> 
> Thanks!
> /peter
> 
> On 17 Jun 2014, at 19:46, Staffan Larsen <staffan.lar...@oracle.com> wrote:
> 
>> Here is a rewrite of the test in Java instead of a shell script. Should be 
>> easier to maintain.
>> 
>> webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sla/8046883/webrev.00/
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> /Staffan
>> 
>> On 17 jun 2014, at 15:12, Staffan Larsen <staffan.lar...@oracle.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> On 17 jun 2014, at 15:03, Alan Bateman <alan.bate...@oracle.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On 17/06/2014 13:35, Staffan Larsen wrote:
>>>>> :
>>>>> 
>>>>> It could be a timing issue, but in the other direction. If cygwin hasn’t 
>>>>> yet started the real windows process when I run ps, then maybe ps will 
>>>>> not list it. But given the “sleep 2” before the ps invocation, the 
>>>>> process should have had time to started. No guarantees of course.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Making the sleep shorter will not help as the process we are starting 
>>>>> will not terminate until we tell it to.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> Okay, although what I was suggesting is to use your patch but additionally 
>>>> move the sleep at L79 into the new while loop so that it doesn't spin 
>>>> quickly through the 10 iterations. That would give the test 10 attempts 
>>>> (and 10 seconds) to get the pid.
>>> 
>>> Ah, I see. I misunderstood your comment.
>>> 
>>> I started looking at rewriting the test in pure Java instead of the shell 
>>> script. With the new Process.getPid() this looks like the best approach. 
>>> I’ll come back with a new review request soon.
>>> 
>>> /Staffan
>> 
> 

Reply via email to