Dmitry,
Thanks for the diff, it helps!
hotspot_webrev/agent/src/share/classes/sun/jvm/hotspot/SAGetopt.java
Uninitialized local definition:
105 char ch;
Unneded second initialization at 111:
104 String carg = _argv[_optind];
111 carg = _argv[_optind];
It is not clear why carg can't be empty:
61 // _argv[_optind] can't be empty, so it's safe to expect at least
one character
62 if (_argv[_optind].charAt(0) == '-') {
...
113 // carg can't be empty so it's safe to expect at least one
character
114 if (carg.charAt(0) != '-' || carg.equals("--")) {
The _argv comes from outside of the method.
How can we be sure that the value _argv[_optind] is not empty String?
Does it comes from an assumption that the outside processing works correctly?
Would it be better to always check that it is not empty?
It feels like this code is not clear and more complex than has to be.
But I can't tell yet what has to be simplified.
For example, I do not like this part:
37 private boolean _optreset; // special handling of first call
44 _optreset = true;
108 if (_optreset) {
138 _optreset = false;
Would it be better to separate this first step from the next() method
and make it a separate method that is called reset() or init()?
Also, there is no clue why all this is necessary.
Other files look good to me.
Do you have another reviewer?
Thanks,
Serguei
On 7/17/15 2:46 AM, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
Serguei,
Previous webrev is:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dsamersoff/JDK-8059038/webrev.05.old
Latest webrev is:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dsamersoff/JDK-8059038/webrev.05
Diff between webrev.05.old and webrev.05 attached
-Dmitry
On 2015-07-17 01:00, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi Dmitry,
I do not see any changes.
Could you please, generate .06 version ?
In such a case, it will be much easier to compare the code.
Thanks,
Serguei
On 7/16/15 8:23 AM, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
Serguei,
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dsamersoff/JDK-8059038/webrev.05
Webrev updated in-place (press shift-reload).
Code changes at ll.119.
Added more comments to other places.
-Dmitry
On 2015-06-27 03:15, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi Dmitry,
Thank you for the update!
The SALauncher.java changes are really nice.
I have just couple of small comments.
agent/src/share/classes/sun/jvm/hotspot/SALauncher.java
343 // Run tmtools
344 if (args[0].equals("jstack")) {
345 runJSTACK(oldArgs);
Why the comment says "Run tmtools", not jstack?
BTW, other fragments have no such a comment which is Ok at it is
obvious.
agent/src/share/classes/sun/jvm/hotspot/SAGetopt.java
There are no checks of the carg length in several places where it is
needed:
61 if (_argv[_optind].charAt(0) == '-') {
112 if (carg.charAt(0) != '-' || carg.equals("--")) {
117 if (carg.charAt(0) == '-' && carg.charAt(1) == '-') {
124 carg = carg.substring(2);
136 ch = carg.charAt(_optopt);
139 ch = carg.charAt(_optopt);
Otherwise, the fix looks good.
Thanks,
Serguei
On 6/24/15 5:37 AM, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
Serguei,
Thank you for the review.
New webrev is here:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dsamersoff/JDK-8059038/webrev.05/
I didn't change naming convention in SAGetoptTest.java and keep a_opt,
b_opt etc as it gives better readability. Other concerns are addressed.
BasicLauncherTest changed to use LingeredApp from testlib.
-Dmitry
On 2015-06-24 08:32, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi Dmitry,
Some quick minor comments.
hotspot_webrev/agent/src/share/classes/sun/jvm/hotspot/SAGetopt.java
Formatting is wrong:
57 if (_optind >_argv.length) {
71 String[] ca = carg.split("=",2);
80 if (los.contains(ca[0]+"=")) {
Need to use camel case for java method names:
55 private void extract_optarg(String opt) {
69 private String process_long_options(String carg, String[]
longOptStr) {
Need to use quotes for '-':
109 // End of option batch like -abc reached, expect
option to start from -
Example is:
133 // At this point carg[0] contains '-'
Wrong indent at 87, 139, 120-121:
85 else {
86 // Mixed style options --file name
87 extract_optarg(ca[0]);
88 }
138 else {
139 ch = carg.charAt(_optopt);
140 }
119 if (longOptStr == null || longOptStr.length ==
0) {
120 // No long options specified, stop options
processing
121 return null;
122 }
hotspot_webrev/agent/src/share/classes/sun/jvm/hotspot/SALauncher.java
Uninitialized local:
128 String s;
Need to use camel case:
126 String exe_or_pid = null;
The main method is too long, I'd suggest to split with the
sub-methods for:
clhsdb, hsdb, jstack, jmap, jinfo
jdk_webrev/test/sun/tools/jhsdb/BasicLauncherTest.java
Wrong indent at 82, 85:
80 return toolProcess.exitValue();
81 } finally {
82 theApp.stopApp();
83 }
84 } catch (IOException | InterruptedException ex) {
85 throw new RuntimeException("Test ERROR " + ex,
ex);
86 }
I do not understand what is the need for nested try statements,
just one
try would be enough:
54 System.out.println("Starting LingeredApp");
55 try {
56 try {
. . .
81 } finally {
82 theApp.stopApp();
83 }
84 } catch (IOException | InterruptedException ex) {
85 throw new RuntimeException("Test ERROR " + ex,
ex);
86 }
98 try {
99 try {
. . .
116 } finally {
117 theApp.stopApp();
118 }
119 } catch (Exception ex) {
120 throw new RuntimeException("Test ERROR " + ex, ex);
121 }
Why do you catch exceptions and throw the RuntimeException's in the
launch() methods
but catch the IOException in main? Would it be better to catch any
Exception?
Too many empty lines:
88
89
90
jdk_webrev/test/sun/tools/jhsdb/LingeredApp.java
Too many empty lines:
275
276
369
jdk_webrev/test/sun/tools/jhsdb/SAGetoptTest.java
Need to use Java naming convention:
36 private static boolean a_opt;
37 private static boolean b_opt;
38 private static boolean c_opt;
39 private static boolean e_opt;
40 private static boolean mixed_opt;
41
42 private static String d_value;
43 private static String exe_value;
44 private static String core_value;
Wrong indent 2 instead of 4:
70 if (s.equals("a")) {
71 a_opt = true;
72 continue;
73 }
74
75 if (s.equals("b")) {
76 b_opt = true;
77 continue;
78 }
79
80 if (s.equals("c")) {
81 c_opt = true;
82 continue;
83 }
84
85 if (s.equals("e")) {
86 e_opt = true;
87 continue;
88 }
89
90 if (s.equals("mixed")) {
91 mixed_opt = true;
92 continue;
93 }
Thanks,
Serguei
On 6/23/15 7:06 AM, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
Hi Everybody,
Please review the changes:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dsamersoff/JDK-8059038/webrev.04/
I'm about to file CCC request for it but would like to get internal
feedback before that.
This fix is introducing native launcher jhsdb for serviceability
agent.
jhsdb
will launch command line debugger clhsdb
jhsdb jstack file core
jhsdb jmap file core
jhsdb jinfo file core
will launch corresponding SA based utility.
-Dmitry
