Hi again,
Just noticed I skipped this question in your reply:


So in ReenterI() the OM_PERFDATA_OP(FutileWakeups, inc()) call immediately
follows an OrderAccess::fence() call. Doesn't that make that increment as
"safe" as it can be without having a real lock?


Yes - odd that I noticed the fence after the update in that code, and not the one right before it!
Thanks,
Tom

Reply via email to