Carsten,

It's been a long time! Thanks for the quick review...

Replies embedded below...

On 10/19/15, 10:09 PM, Carsten Varming wrote:
Dear Dan,

I thought acquire/release semantics mandated that the release should be paired with an acquire.

Yes, src/share/vm/runtime/orderAccess.hpp is pretty clear about
that. I modeled this fix after some other ObjectMonitor code
that doesn't (yet) follow that mandate.


In this case, the first line in verify_objmon_isinpool should be changed from "PaddedEnd<ObjectMonitor> * block = (PaddedEnd<ObjectMonitor> *)gBlockList" to use a load_acquire. Actually, it seems like there are a lot of reads of gBlockList that should be replaced with a load_acquire in synchronizer.cpp.

Yes, that would be a good change and cleanup. The really annoying
part is that the current fix seems to have resolved the bug...

Current numbers: 700K iterations of 4 fastdebug instances in parallel
in 4.5 days. I typically saw one failure per day in a three day run...



Otherwise the change looks great.

Thanks!

Dan



Carsten
(not a reviewer).

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 8:02 PM, Daniel D. Daugherty <daniel.daughe...@oracle.com <mailto:daniel.daughe...@oracle.com>> wrote:

    Greetings,

    I have a fix for a long standing race between the lock-free
    ObjectMonitor
    verification code and the normal (locked) ObjectMonitor block
    allocation
    code path. For this fix, I would like at least a Runtime team reviewer
    and a Serviceability team reviewer. Thanks!

    JDK-8047212
    runtime/ParallelClassLoading/bootstrap/random/inner-complex
assert(ObjectSynchronizer::verify_objmon_isinpool(inf)) failed:
                monitor is invalid
    https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8047212

    Webrev URL:
    http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dcubed/8047212-webrev/0-jdk9-hs-rt/
    <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Edcubed/8047212-webrev/0-jdk9-hs-rt/>

    Testing: Aurora Adhoc RT-SVC nightly batch
             4 inner-complex fastdebug parallel runs for 4+ days and
               600K iterations without seeing this failure; the experiment
               is still running; final results to be reported at the end
               of the review cycle
             JPRT -testset hotspot

    This fix:

    - makes ObjectMonitor::gBlockList volatile
    - uses "OrderAccess::release_store_ptr(&gBlockList, temp)" to
      make sure the new block updates _happen before_ gBlockList is
      changed to refer to the new block
    - add SA support for a "static pointer volatile" field like:

        static ObjectMonitor * volatile gBlockList;

    See the following link for a nice description of what "volatile"
    means in the different positions on a variable/parameter decl line:

    
http://www.embedded.com/electronics-blogs/beginner-s-corner/4023801/Introduction-to-the-Volatile-Keyword

    Thanks, in advance, for any comments, questions or suggestions.

    Dan


Reply via email to