On 15/12/2015 10:18 PM, Ivan Gerasimov wrote:
while(true) would convey that much more clearly - and perhaps obviate
the need for pr_ex.
Yes, I can surely transform the code
- while (pr_ex != curr_id) {
+ if (pr_ex != curr_id) {
+ while (true} {
The intention was to save a line :-)
I'll use while (true), if it improves readability.
It does :) And I don't you need pr_ex then as you can just compare
OrderAccess::load_acquire(&process_exiting) with the current thread id -
right?
Thanks,
David
Sincerely yours,
Ivan