On 22/01/16 15:58, Andrew Hughes wrote:
>Yes - please fix this issue in JDK 9 first as per rule 1:
>http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk8u/groundrules.html
>
>In a nutshell, produce a JDK 9 webrev, send it to
>serviceability-dev@openjdk.java.net for review and once reviewed, push
>to jdk9/dev forest. Once done, you can then submit a JDK 8u integration
>approval request.
I've applied Severin's patch to 9 and it applies as-is, once shuffled.
Are the existing reviews sufficient? Jaroslav, Daniel & I have all OKed
it already.
I do think the copyright notice should read 'Red Hat' and I've raised
this with Severin.
I'm not sure. Everyone reviews and fixes in JDK 9 first and then
backports where necessary. Since this was also reviewed on
serviceability-dev, I think you might not need another round of reviews.
regards,
Sean.
