> On Mar 14, 2016, at 2:46 AM, David Holmes <david.hol...@oracle.com> wrote: > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8137165 > Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dholmes/8137165/webrev/ > > This isn't a fix per-se but some additional diagnostic code to try and detect > the conditions where the bug might manifest. The basic failure mode was:
Changes look good. Good cleanup with the sigemptyset calls. Pedantic is a good thing when dealing with POSIX. Since this isn’t an actual fix, should the change be associated with a different bug number? Or are you treating this as the moral equivalent of resolving as not reproducible?
