Hi
I don't think that sleep is a good way to ensure that thread is started.
It is not reliable on the slow host / VM under stress and just waste of
time on fast host.
Is it possible just to add any explicit synchronization to ensure that
NamedThread is started?
Leonid
On 05.04.2016 13:23, Cheleswer Sahu wrote:
Hi,
Please review the code changes for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8153319.
Webrev link: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~csahu/8153319/
Bug Brief: Test is failing on some platforms.
Problem Identified: Newly created child thread (NamedThread) is finished its execution
before main thread calls "jstack", which result in test failure.
Solution Proposed: Set the child thread in sleep state for forever and make sure that "jstack
" tool always gets executed after " NamedThread" is started.
Regards,
Cheleswer
