Serguei, Dmitry,

Thank you for the feedback! Here is an updated webrev.01; http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ddmitriev/8150758/webrev.01/ <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eddmitriev/8150758/webrev.01/>


Dmitry

On 20.09.2016 12:48, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
Dmitry,

Please, also change

!strcmp(...) to strcmp(...) == 0

because semantically strcmp result is not a boolean false.

-Dmitry

On 2016-09-20 06:38, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi Dmitry,


Thanks a lot for this additional test coverage and discovering new bug:
   https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8165681

The tests look pretty good to me.

A couple of minor comments.

Dots are missed in the .c files comments.


http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ddmitriev/8150758/webrev.00/test/serviceability/jvmti



  265         printf("Expecting to find '%s' class in ClassLoad events
duringVM start phase.\n", EXPECTED_SIGNATURE);
  266         if (class_in_class_load_events_vm_start == JNI_FALSE) {
  267             throw_exc(env, "Unable to find expected class in
ClassLoad events duringstart phase!\n");
  268             return FAILED;
  269         }
  270
  271         if (class_prepare_events_vm_start_count == 0) {
  272             throw_exc(env, "Didn't get ClassPrepare events in start
phase!\n");
  273             return FAILED;
  274         }
  275
  276         printf("Expecting to find '%s' class in ClassPrepare events
duringVM start phase.\n", EXPECTED_SIGNATURE);
  277         if (class_in_class_prepare_events_vm_start == JNI_FALSE) {
  278             throw_exc(env, "Unable to find expected class in
ClassPrepare events duringstart phase!\n");
  279             return FAILED;
  280         }


    Could you, please, replace "start phase" with "early start phase"?
It will be more clear that the start phase mode is "early".

  288         if (class_in_class_prepare_events_vm_start == JNI_TRUE) {
  289             throw_exc(env, "Class is found in ClassLoad events
duringVM Start phase!\n");
  290             return FAILED;
  291         }
  292
  293         printf("Expecting that '%s' class is absent in ClassPrepare
events.\n", EXPECTED_SIGNATURE);
  294         if (class_in_class_prepare_events_vm_start == JNI_TRUE) {
  295             throw_exc(env, "Class is found in ClassPrepare events
duringVM Start phase!\n");
  296             return FAILED;
  297         }

    Could you, please, replace "VM Start phase" with "normal VM start
phase"?    It will be more clear that the start phase mode is "normal".
Thanks, Serguei On 9/19/16 05:47, Dmitry Dmitriev wrote:
Hello, Please review new tests for module aware agents. There are 3
tests: 1) MAAClassFileLoadHook.java - verifies ClassFileLoadHook event
with different combinations of can_generate_early_vmstart and
can_generate_early_class_hook_events JVMTI capabilities. Expects to
find(or not) class from java.base module in the right VM phase. 2)
MAAClassLoadPrepare.java - verifies ClassLoad and ClassPrepare events
with and without can_generate_early_vmstart JVMTI capability. Expects
to find(or not) class from java.base module in the VM start phase. 3)
MAAThreadStart.java - verifies ThreadStart event with
can_generate_early_vmstart JVMTI capability. Expect to find events in
the VM start phase. JBS:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8150758 webrev.00:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ddmitriev/8150758/webrev.00/
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eddmitriev/8150758/webrev.00/> Testing:
RBT on all platforms Thanks, Dmitry


Reply via email to