Thank you very much for the review.
I still need a (R)eveiwer to approve the fix. Could someone, please, review
this simple one-line change?
----- Original Message -----
To: alexander.kulyakh...@oracle.com, firstname.lastname@example.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 5:33:45 PM GMT +03:00 Iraq
Subject: Re: RFR: 8158797: Test
java/lang/management/MemoryMXBean/LowMemoryTest.java fails when GC is specified
Looks good. Please correct copyright year in the header(2015 -> 2016).
Not need a new webrev for that.
On 10.10.2016 13:51, Alexander Kulyakhtin wrote:
> Could you, please, review this simple, test-only change:
> CR: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8158797 "Test
> java/lang/management/MemoryMXBean/LowMemoryTest.java fails when GC is
> specified explicitly"
> In order to verify some expected behavior, the test specifies its own GC
> options when running.
> Currently, if the testing framework runs this test with some other explicitly
> specifed GC options, then the test fails with "Conflicting collector
> combinations in option list" message.
> We are modifying the test so that it runs only when the framework does not
> specify any GC options.
> Best regards,