Hi Daniil,

Have you run with -Xcomp. I'm concerned that inlining will cause the test to fail because stack depths will not be as expected. Also, if you find the owned monitor, but the depth is not as expected, I think you are better off printing an error message right away rather than the somewhat misleading "FAIL: invalid number of %s monitors" message later on.

thanks,

Chris

On 1/16/18 6:31 PM, Daniil Titov wrote:
Hello,

Please review  an updated fix that makes the test more extensive and includes 
suggested changes.

Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8153629
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dtitov/8153629/webrev.02/

Thank you!

Best regards,
Daniil

On 1/12/18, 2:26 PM, "serguei.spit...@oracle.com" <serguei.spit...@oracle.com> 
wrote:

     Hi Daniil,
It is pretty good in general.
     Thank you for taking care about it!
Some comments though. The test case is too trivial.
     I'd suggest to extend it to have at least a couple of locks in the
     returned array.
     One way to do it would be to add a instance synchronized method and
     invoke it from the synchronized statement of the tested Thread.
     Then the verifyOwnedMonitors() can be invoked from this method.
A couple of comments on the native agent. 72 // JNI_OnLoad has not been called yet, so can't possibly be an instance of TEST_CLASS. Could you, please, rewrite this comment?
     Maybe just tell that there probably was an error in loading the TEST_CLASS.
     What about moving the FindClass(env, TEST_CLASS) to the
     verifyOwnedMonitors() function?
     It will make the testClass variable local.
200 fprintf(stderr, "VerifyOwnedMonitors: FAIL: stackDepthInfo[0].stack_depth should be 1.\n"); 207 fprintf(stderr, "VerifyOwnedMonitors: FAIL: monitorCount should be 1.\n"); It'd better to rephrase the messages above to tell about actual values
     vs expected.
     It normally simplifies the analysis of failures as there is no need to find
     what values were printed before and that they are exactly what needed
     for comparison.
Thanks,
     Serguei
On 1/11/18 17:45, Daniil Titov wrote:
     > Hello,
     >
     > Please review the following fix that adds a jtreg test for 
GetOwnedMonitorStackDepthInfo JVMTI function.
     >
     > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8153629
     > Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dtitov/8153629/webrev.00
     >
     >
     > The tests ran successfully with Mach5.
     >
     > Best regards,
     > Daniil
     >
     >


Reply via email to