Hi Yasumasa,
I only see the one reported failure in our recent test history for this
test, so it doesn't look like it happens every time. I'll try running
the test on the machine it failed on, both with the binary it failed
with and a more recent binary.
best regards,
chris
On 5/3/18 4:48 AM, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
FYI: jdk-11-ea+11 passed GcTest01.java
https://download.java.net/openjdk/testresults/11/archives/11/diff-hotspot-10-11.txt
On 2018/05/02 21:46, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
Hi all,
I've tried to fix 8202466, but I do not yet certain which solution is
the best for it.
So I want your opinion for it.
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8202466
David reports serviceability/tmtools/jstat/GcTest01.java failed in
Mach5. It seems to appear on OS X only.
He has shared jtreg report, and I found as below:
```
stdout: S0C S1C S0U S1U EC EU OC OU MC MU CCSC CCSU YGC YGCT FGC FGCT
CGC CGCT GCT
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3072.0 0.0 11264.0 2825.6 9472.0 9003.3 1024.0
845.3 26 0.204 3 0.292 1 0.000 0.497
```
YGCT: 0.204
FGCT: 0.292
CGCT: 0.000
GCT: 0.497
I guess this failure was caused by rounding error because (YGCT +
FGCT + CGCT) < GCT.
CGC is 1, so CGC operation might finish in very short time.
GcTest01.java:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/file/4da7dce7e2bf/test/hotspot/jtreg/serviceability/tmtools/jstat/GcTest01.java#l57
GcCauseTest01.java:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/file/4da7dce7e2bf/test/hotspot/jtreg/serviceability/tmtools/jstat/GcCauseTest01.java#l53
GcTest01 and GcCauseTest01 are very similar, but GcCauseTest01 passed.
Both tests use GcProvoker::provokeGc() to inflate memory usage. So I
wonder why GcTest01 just only failed.
I guess we might encounter similar issue(s) in the future if we get
more fast machines.
Hence I think we can take two approaches as below:
1. Add all tests in serviceability/tmtools/jstat to ProblemList.
2. Change all JstatGc*Tool to use custom jstat_options - to show
raw values in PerfCounters
What do you think?
I can start to work for it if they are OK.
Thanks,
Yasumasa
